Which towns Colchester is measured against, where each comparison group came from, what each one is good and bad at — and a rule anyone can re-run.
Any comparison of towns is a choice, and the choice changes the answer. Compare Colchester to Greenwich and it looks frugal. Compare it to Bozrah and it looks large. Neither comparison is wrong; both are close to meaningless. This page lists every comparison group used on this site, says plainly where it came from, what it is good at, what it is bad at, and how you can check or replace it.
The site's answer to "who picked these towns?" is not "trust the author." It is: here is the group, here is its origin, here is its known weakness, and here is a rule you can run yourself that picks a group without anyone's judgment involved.
The CT State Department of Education sorted school districts into groups with similar family characteristics: family income, parents' education and occupation, family structure, poverty, home language, and enrollment. Colchester is in DRG D, along with Berlin, Bethel, Branford, Clinton, Cromwell, East Granby, East Hampton, East Lyme, Ledyard, Milford, New Milford, Newington, North Haven, Old Saybrook, Rocky Hill, Shelton, Southington, Stonington, Wallingford, Waterford, Watertown, Wethersfield, and Windsor.
The towns a Colchester resident actually compares themselves to: same labor market, same regional services, same weather, same road-salt contracts, often the same newspaper.
Instead of choosing peers, rank Colchester against everyone and report where it lands.
Every group above was assembled by a person. This one is not. Each town's characteristics are standardized across all 169 towns, and the towns closest to Colchester in that standardized space become the peer set. Change the rule and the list changes; run it unchanged and you get the same list every time.
There are two sets, because the two questions have different drivers — using one peer group for both is the flaw this is meant to correct.
For each variable, every town's value is converted to a standard score — how many standard deviations above or below the statewide average it sits. Each town then becomes a point in that space, and the peers are the towns nearest Colchester. Two choices are worth stating openly, because they change the result:
Wealth is measured as equalized net grand list per resident — the town's taxable property restated to full market value, divided by population. It is both a reasonable proxy for community wealth and the quantity that actually limits what a mill rate can raise.
python Data/fetch_ct_ucoa.py && python Data/build_peer_sets.py
Inputs come from CT OPM Municipal Fiscal Indicators (ej6f-y2wf), fiscal year ending 2023. Output, including every town's distance so the cut at 12 can be moved or checked: ct_peer_sets.json. Full method notes in METHODOLOGY.md and data-dictionary.md.
The 12 nearest towns for each question, with how each one relates to the hand-built groups. neighbor DRG D both neither
Loading…
Where does Colchester sit among all Connecticut towns?
Loading…
Source: CT OPM Municipal Fiscal Indicators (ej6f-y2wf), fiscal year ending 2023, all 169 towns. Higher is not better or worse — it is only higher. A high rank on reserves and a high rank on mill rate mean very different things, and this chart takes no position on either. Note the per-pupil figure here is OPM education expenditures ÷ enrollment (audited, all funds); it is not the CSDE Net Current Expenditure Per Pupil series used on the education pages, and the two are not interchangeable.
Does the answer change when the comparison group changes?
Loading…
Source: CT OPM Municipal Fiscal Indicators (ej6f-y2wf), total_expenditures ÷ population, fiscal year ending 2023. Group medians exclude Colchester. These are audited all-funds actuals, gross of grant pass-throughs — not the adopted general-fund budget series used on the Budget Trends page.
A label that said the wrong thing. Two scatter charts on the Budget Trends page showed a four-town set — Ellington, Tolland, Ledyard, Montville — labelled "DRG Peers." Only Ledyard is actually in Colchester's DRG D; Ellington and Tolland are DRG C and Montville is DRG F. Those four are the towns Colchester is most often measured against locally, which is a reasonable thing to chart, but it is not a District Reference Group. They are now labelled "often-compared towns." The 24-town DRG D set used on the growth charts was correct and is unchanged.
One peer set doing two jobs. Town-side spending and school spending have different drivers, and a single peer group cannot serve both. The rule-based sets are split accordingly, and where a chart on this site compares municipal operations using an education-derived grouping, that limitation is now stated rather than assumed away.
Colchester’s own series behind the charts on this page, as text. Each table names the dataset it came from and the year of every row. The peer towns and group medians the charts also plot are not repeated here; they are in the same source files, linked in the footer.
Hebron · Marlborough · Lebanon · Salem · Bozrah · East Hampton · East Haddam · Montville
The towns that share a border or an immediate labor market. Right for regional context; they are not matched on size or wealth.
Berlin · Bethel · Branford · Clinton · Cromwell · East Granby · East Hampton · East Lyme · Ledyard · Milford · New Milford · Newington · North Haven · Old Saybrook · Rocky Hill · Shelton · Southington · Stonington · Wallingford · Waterford · Watertown · Wethersfield · Windsor
The CT State Department of Education grouping of school districts on family income, parent education, family structure and enrollment. Last assigned in 2006, and built for education questions rather than town-side spending.
Ellington · Wethersfield · Ledyard · East Hampton · Woodstock · Coventry · Plainville · Portland · Wolcott · Hebron · Montville · Somers
Town-side spending, debt, reserves, and tax comparisons. Chosen by a published formula over state data rather than by hand: the nearest towns by standardized distance on the stated variables.
Wolcott · Plainfield · Plainville · Ledyard · Seymour · Hebron · Brooklyn · Ellington · East Hampton · Coventry · Wethersfield · Woodstock
Education spending comparisons. Chosen by a published formula over state data rather than by hand: the nearest towns by standardized distance on the stated variables.
Colchester is left out of each list above, because a town is never part
of the benchmark it is measured against. Group medians elsewhere on the site
exclude it the same way.
Sources: surrounding towns and District Reference Group are
the published groupings; the peer sets are built by a stated formula over CT
OPM data (Data/build_peer_sets.py), not selected by hand.
| Measure | Colchester | Rank, lowest to highest | Statewide median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total expenditures per resident | $4,076 | 72 of 169 | $4,217 |
| Education expenditures per pupil | $22,078 | 73 of 169 | $22,590 |
| Equalized mill rate | 19.11 mills | 115 of 169 | 17.18 mills |
| Equalized net grand list per resident | $142,320 | 35 of 169 | $189,668 |
| Total fund balance as a share of total expenditures | 18.1% | 69 of 169 | 19.9% |
| Bonded long-term debt per resident | $1,265 | 61 of 169 | $1,741 |
| Intergovernmental revenue as a share of total revenues | 30.6% | 136 of 169 | 20.5% |
A rank is a position, not a grade. Which end of the list is preferable depends on the measure and on what a reader is trying to find out. Per-pupil spending here is OPM education expenditures divided by average daily membership, which is not the state Department of Education's Net Current Expenditures Per Pupil. Source: CT OPM, Municipal Fiscal Indicators (ej6f-y2wf) - audited actuals as filed by each town. Ranks computed for FY 2022-23 across all 169 towns.
| Fiscal year | Population | Enrollment (average daily membership) | Equalized net grand list |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2013-14 | 16,192 | 2,847 | $1,713,186,821 |
| FY 2014-15 | 16,130 | 2,767 | $1,683,452,351 |
| FY 2015-16 | 16,061 | 2,705 | $1,686,095,860 |
| FY 2016-17 | 16,029 | 2,624 | $1,697,800,704 |
| FY 2017-18 | 15,936 | 2,533 | $1,718,352,556 |
| FY 2018-19 | 15,809 | 2,404 | $1,818,727,792 |
| FY 2019-20 | 15,548 | 2,373 | $1,829,126,260 |
| FY 2020-21 | 15,501 | 2,212 | $1,956,061,777 |
| FY 2021-22 | 15,572 | 2,239 | $2,252,056,359 |
| FY 2022-23 | 15,504 | 2,202 | $2,206,523,392 |
These are the size and wealth measures the peer groups described on this page are built from. Source: CT OPM, Municipal Fiscal Indicators (ej6f-y2wf) - audited actuals as filed by each town.